Last edited by dangel 26-07-2007 at 01:36 PM . directhex’s technique Motherboard: MSI X99A Gaming 7 CPU: Intel Core i7 5280k Memory: 32GiB ADATA DDR4 Storage: Corsair Neutron XT 960GB Graphics card(s): MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G Twin Frozr five PSU: Corsair AX860i Circumstance: NZXT H440 Functioning Procedure: Ubuntu seventeen. 10, Windows 10 Monitor(s): Dell U2713HM World-wide-web: FIOS. rn/me flings some glade XML and gtk# all-around. dangel’s program Motherboard: See My Sig CPU: See My Sig Memory: See My Sig Storage: See My Sig Graphics card(s): See My Sig PSU: See My Sig Case: See My Sig Functioning Process: Home windows ten Keep track of(s): See My Sig Online: 60mbit Sky LLU. directhex’s program Motherboard: MSI X99A Gaming seven CPU: Intel Main i7 5280k Memory: 32GiB ADATA DDR4 Storage: Corsair Neutron XT 960GB Graphics card(s): MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G Twin Frozr 5 PSU: Corsair AX860i Case: NZXT H440 Running Process: Ubuntu 17. ten, Home windows 10 Keep an eye on(s): Dell U2713HM Internet: FIOS. nah, in seriousness, i consider i can see component of the pondering at the rear of the more bizarre mixed-information format of XAML – the further more from pixel-certain placement that veteran winforms coders are taken, the extra they are going to scream blue murder. personally i dislike the absolute positioning of winforms, and welcome anything that’ll aid to close these darkish-age style and design tactics. but i assume kapowaz is a minor really hard on microsoft with his synopsis – “horrifically backwards wondering”? way to describe far much too several coders – the kinds who’ll be insisting that they are going to in no way shift up from vb6 mainly because . web is certainly gradual and bloated and terrible and isn’t going to love them any longer. i despise microsoft’s damaged xml (xaml, place of work xml) but what ever happens, it is really an enhancement on what came just before. kapowaz’s technique CPU: MacBook Pro 15″nah, in seriousness, i believe i can see aspect of the contemplating at the rear of the much more bizarre blended-data format of XAML – the further from pixel-unique placement that veteran winforms coders are taken, the far more they will scream blue murder. personally i despise the complete positioning of winforms, and welcome everything that’ll enable to conclude such darkish-age design and style methods. but i imagine kapowaz is a minimal difficult on microsoft with his synopsis – “horrifically backwards contemplating”? way to explain much way too a lot of coders – the kinds who’ll be insisting that they will in no way transfer up from vb6 due to the fact . net is certainly sluggish and bloated and terrible and will not appreciate them anymore. There’s absolutely no rationale that whichever choice know-how they’d come up with could have given just as a great deal pixel-exact situation as they want – soon after all, you can create an interface in XUL/CSS and have it show up exactly how you want with complete certainty on all platforms. The explanation I am challenging on MS is since they truly never should not have people establishing languages who’re unaware of the background behind HTML and tag soup, and irrespective of reason, HTML was the inspiration for XAML (even if it was indirectly, via XUL).
The lessons acquired from that as to why construction and presentation need to be independent ought to have been applied, but clearly weren’t. If I keep them to a substantial normal it can be because they definitely have the means to do the greatest doable task. But you might very well be ideal if people aren’t even ready to make the leap from VB6 to . Internet then this will mostly be irrelevent to them (while frankly, if you are even now building a dwelling from VB6 apps then you’ve got both strike a goldmine or you’ve closed your self off to the hard cash cow that is the world-wide-web). How to develop a repeating pattern of a described time on a graph?Sat, 03/05/2011 – ten:fifty two pm. I am executing electrophysiological experiments in which a repetitive stimulus is utilized around a described time window within just a greater sampling interval especially:A solitary sweep is 5 seconds extensive.
Inside that 5 seconds, a repetitive stimulus is used from t=three to t=4 seconds.